chip fireball wrote:
or alternatively you could, like, not read it. or read the first 2 pages and think, woah staedy on, this is like heavy shiit, im not liking it, im gonna have a wander back to the picture thread.
only when folk is walking to north tees to have operations and shiit cos they cant afford a taxi, dont start saying, jeez how has that come about, thats a bit naughty, you would have thought the politicians would have considered that, cos it will be too bloody late.
anyhows theres a good anti darlo thread on rivals at them moment. loads of swearing, and threats of violence. let me look for the link....hang on i had i here somewhere... timmy mate, im gonna have to get back to you on this one, ive got a bath running and im gonna be in there some time with the sebastian faulks novel engleby. only dont be a tw@t and ruin the ending for me by posting what happens, theres a good chap.
You can be a sarky bastad ((c)adg) can't you Mr Fireball. But having said that, young timmy should take heed of your advise. What is the point of reading a thread, which may be going on a little bit, and then complaining about the content. It reminds me of the 'Mary Whitehouse' types who complain about all the sex and violence in a TV programme, "Don't watch the bl**dy thing then".
"Certainly, it's hard to imagine being like Engleby. When he's not being 'dim', he's being clever, though no less annoying, with grating cultural analyses, wine tips, ruminations on time and literary theory, sniffy asides about people who say 'I' when they mean 'me' and can't spell and ask for their steak well done. Everything is beneath him."
It's not giving away the ending Chip, but is Mr Faulks novel about you?