Splod wrote:
So who gets to vote for the AVC, the poor punters who get the 1p in the £ (which might be worth 30p in £) and/or the preferential creditors lke the IR and VAT. So can HMG effectively vote to get others shafted.
It just proves the point - if you owe a few grand you are bad risk with no credit rating but if you owe tens of millions you are an entrepreneur and a businessman

.
Everyone gets to vote and their vote is worth the cash that they are owed. Once the 'yes' vote gets to 51% of the company's debts the CVA is a formality.
In reality there's no point in voting no. If the well's run dry and you want to get anything at all back, i.e. the VAT, the tax relief and/or your wages you might as well vote yes, if you vote no and the CVA doesn't go ahead, the company will be liquidated, the IR and VAT will be paid and anything else in the pot will go in the massive fees that the Liquidator will charge for his services. In a CVA, the fees are minimised although still extortionate.
In actual fact, if you owe a few grand and you've nothing at risk like a house, you can actually go bankrupt very easily and these days can be discharged from bankruptcy in a very short period of time. It's quite fashionable for newly qualified students to do this to get rid of their student loans. I did read somewhere that this particular loophole was being plugged though.