Supporters

jockthemonkey · **Posted:** Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:27 pm

offshorepoolie wrote:

sup·port·er Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[suh-pawr-ter, -pohr-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun

1. a person or thing that supports.
2. an adherent, follower, backer, or advocate.
3. a device, usually of elastic cotton webbing, for supporting some part of the body, esp. a jockstrap.
4. a garter, esp. one attached to a garter belt or girdle.
5. Heraldry. either of two human or animal figures flanking and supporting an escutcheon in an achievement of arms.

Support

sup·port –verb (used with object)

1. to bear or hold up (a load, mass, structure, part, etc.); serve as a foundation for.
2. to sustain or withstand (weight, pressure, strain, etc.) without giving way; serve as a prop for.
3. to undergo or endure, esp. with patience or submission; tolerate.
4. to sustain (a person, the mind, spirits, courage, etc.) under trial or affliction: They supported him throughout his ordeal.
5. to maintain (a person, family, establishment, institution, etc.) by supplying with things necessary to existence; provide for: to support a family.
6. to uphold (a person, cause, policy, etc.) by aid, countenance, one's vote, etc.; back; second.

I think some of you should read these definitions and see how you square them with being "supporters" who "support" a team..

I don't see the mackems baying for their Roy Keanes head and they're FAR worse offf than we are!

I'd look up the verb and adjectives for whinging gets or bad loser but I can't be arsed..

You all should take a sabatical before posting after defeat..

Unbeaten at home until yesterday since October..

Most of the detractors where only predicting a mid table finish this year..

Even I think that's the best we can hope for now but some of you will only be happy if we get relegated so you can say I told you so ... :roll:

Never mind we could always bounce back with the next sacrificial lamb who can be sacked after getting us promoted on the back of a club record run after a bit of a sticky patch at the start of season..

Finally

Oh I was'nt going to say it but maybe you'd be better off up the road and following messiah..... :shock:

WOW where did that come from i am shocked :shock:

but i feel i must warn you they are very unforgiving on here clappp

gremmlin · **Joined:** Fri Oct 05, 2007 9:23 am **Posts:** 3141

offshorepoolie wrote:

sup·port·er Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[suh-pawr-ter, -pohr-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun

1. a person or thing that supports.
2. an adherent, follower, backer, or advocate.
3. a device, usually of elastic cotton webbing, for supporting some part of the body, esp. a jockstrap.
4. a garter, esp. one attached to a garter belt or girdle.
5. Heraldry. either of two human or animal figures flanking and supporting an escutcheon in an achievement of arms.

Support

sup·port –verb (used with object)

1. to bear or hold up (a load, mass, structure, part, etc.); serve as a foundation for.
2. to sustain or withstand (weight, pressure, strain, etc.) without giving way; serve as a prop for.
3. to undergo or endure, esp. with patience or submission; tolerate.
4. to sustain (a person, the mind, spirits, courage, etc.) under trial or affliction: They supported him throughout his ordeal.
5. to maintain (a person, family, establishment, institution, etc.) by supplying with things necessary to existence; provide for: to support a family.
6. to uphold (a person, cause, policy, etc.) by aid, countenance, one's vote, etc.; back; second.

I think some of you should read these definitions and see how you square them with being "supporters" who "support" a team..

I don't see the mackems baying for their Roy Keanes head and they're FAR worse offf than we are!

I'd look up the verb and adjectives for whinging gets or bad loser but I can't be arsed..

You all should take a sabatical before posting after defeat..

Unbeaten at home until yesterday since October..

Most of the detractors where only predicting a mid table finish this year..

Even I think that's the best we can hope for now but some of you will only be happy if we get relegated so you can say I told you so ... :roll:

Never mind we could always bounce back with the next sacrificial lamb who can be sacked after getting us promoted on the back of a club record run after a bit of a sticky patch at the start of season..

Finally

Oh I was'nt going to say it but maybe you'd be better off up the road and following messiah..... :shock:

this has to be a wind up who has logged in and posted this come on quakerz hold your hand up

pooielooieaustinstad · **Posted:** Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:39 pm

jockthemonkey wrote:

offshorepoolie wrote:

sup·port·er Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[suh-pawr-ter, -pohr-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun

1. a person or thing that supports.
2. an adherent, follower, backer, or advocate.
3. a device, usually of elastic cotton webbing, for supporting some part of the body, esp. a jockstrap.
4. a garter, esp. one attached to a garter belt or girdle.
5. Heraldry. either of two human or animal figures flanking and supporting an escutcheon in an achievement of arms.

Support

sup·port –verb (used with object)

1. to bear or hold up (a load, mass, structure, part, etc.); serve as a foundation for.
2. to sustain or withstand (weight, pressure, strain, etc.) without giving way; serve as a prop for.
3. to undergo or endure, esp. with patience or submission; tolerate.
4. to sustain (a person, the mind, spirits, courage, etc.) under trial or affliction: They supported him throughout his ordeal.
5. to maintain (a person, family, establishment, institution, etc.) by supplying with things necessary to existence; provide for: to support a family.
6. to uphold (a person, cause, policy, etc.) by aid, countenance, one's vote, etc.; back; second.

I think some of you should read these definitions and see how you square them with being "supporters" who "support" a team..

I don't see the mackems baying for their Roy Keanes head and they're FAR worse offf than we are!

I'd look up the verb and adjectives for whinging gets or bad loser but I can't be arsed..

You all should take a sabatical before posting after defeat..

Unbeaten at home until yesterday since October..

Most of the detractors where only predicting a mid table finish this year..

Even I think that's the best we can hope for now but some of you will only be happy if we get relegated so you can say I told you so ... :roll:

Never mind we could always bounce back with the next sacrificial lamb who can be sacked after getting us promoted on the back of a club record run after a bit of a sticky patch at the start of season..

Finally

Oh I was'nt going to say it but maybe you'd be better off up the road and following messiah..... :shock:

WOW where did that come from i am shocked :shock:

but i feel i must warn you they are very unforgiving on here clappp

Now you've done it Mr offshorepoolie, they'll all be beside themselves, can you imagine the shock and horror on the faces, how dare you be positive and have a bit of optimism clappp

The Lightning Tree · **Joined:** Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:30 pm **Posts:** 5804

Danny Wilson fan club is out in full force tonight!

jockthemonkey · **Posted:** Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:32 pm

offshorepoolie wrote:

Sorry, not Danny Wilson just Hartlepool UNITED

as long as danny is manager its one and the same i take my hat off to you mr offshore clappp

The Lightning Tree · **Joined:** Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:30 pm **Posts:** 5804

Hang on, tell me of which signings he has made are good enough to play league 1 football for this club.

I can think of 2!!

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 41347

They talk of loyalty from a distance..........in the way Generals behind the lines think war is a big game..... they're detached from reality. :roll:

tom-pie · **Posted:** Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:48 pm

the way i see it anybody can support a club, but of those who dont go there opinions are worthless

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 41347

The rules of nornality don't apply in football... as evidenced by the illogical denunciation of anyone who dares not to accept the dross served up this season.

jools · **Posted:** Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:52 pm

tom-pie wrote:

the way i see it anybody can support a club, but of those who dont go there opinions are worthless

shhh

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:08 am

there are some real deluded Pools supporters out there!

I could have used the word 'thick' instead of deluded but I wanted to be a bit more polite.

jockthemonkey · **Posted:** Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:58 am

chip fireball wrote:

poolieinaustinstad is a loid on the wind up that has become tiresome. yawn1

mr austinstad as an attendence record for home and away games that can not be matched by anybody on this bunker banghead

tom-pie · **Posted:** Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:09 am

wait 50 years and ill smash his record :wink:

Fensy · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:15 pm **Posts:** 6520

jockthemonkey wrote:

chip fireball wrote:

poolieinaustinstad is a loid on the wind up that has become tiresome. yawn1

mr austinstad as an attendence record for home and away games that can not be matched by anybody on this bunker banghead

I am willing to wager that Monkeyharris will be equal if not better

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 41347

jockthemonkey wrote:

chip fireball wrote:

poolieinaustinstad is a loid on the wind up that has become tiresome. yawn1

mr austinstad as an attendence record for home and away games that can not be matched by anybody on this bunker banghead

.So does the team coach driver, doesn't mean he's right though does it?

Gibsons Beard · **Posted:** Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:01 am

jockthemonkey wrote:

chip fireball wrote:

poolieinaustinstad is a loid on the wind up that has become tiresome. yawn1

mr austinstad as an attendence record for home and away games that can not be matched by anybody on this bunker banghead

Yeah but a good attendance at games does not mean you necessarily have a clue. Danny Wilson has been to all the games and he is clueless when it comes to our team. :roll:

pooielooieaustinstad · **Posted:** Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:59 pm

chip fireball wrote:

poolieinaustinstad is a loid on the wind up that has become tiresome. yawn1

Hey up Mr Chip, I'm on no wind up and I'm no loid thank you very much, and I'm also no yes man who will follow the pack at the first sign of trouble.
What we learned back in the day was to support our team through thick and thin, even back then in the day you got the odd few who would never be happy no matter what, it's just unfortunate we seem to have more of them now.
Fair enough you might want DW, Barker, Antwi, Elliott, Boland, and no doubt a few others I might have missed out, and one things for certain they will all eventually go, but they will be replaced by others that will all make mistakes at some point, then what, let's start hounding them out.
I wish I could be arsed to read your posts after the Luton, Orient, Leeds, Port Vale and Oldham games when all the above played a major part in those performances that were reckoned by most to be the best football we had ever played.
Your posts are just so one sided and cock eyed it's not true, if you want to slag players off for making mistakes then fair enough, just be consistant, i.e. Nelson going to ground too easily for the fist goal, no mention, Robson losing possesion too easily for the 2nd goal, no mention, Brown missing an absolute sitter 5 yard tap in to equalise, no mention, Barker missing a header from 8 yards, priceless just what we wanted.
There's been a few decent posts from the pessemists lately, (yours excluded obviously) regarding team spirit or lack of it and I do think that's a problem, cos I do think some of the new signings have just come for a decent salary and will jump ship anyway at the first opportunity for a couple of extra bob.
But I also think there is a fear factor amongst the players, no-one is prepared to take a chance or even want the ball anymore, so like I've said in the past we need more of clappp

and less of rage

And yes I know you give total support whilst you're there yawn2

but you also make sure you make up for it when you're not

no6bus · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:55 pm **Posts:** 5096

Snowy · **Joined:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:18 pm **Posts:** 41347

pooielooieaustinstad wrote:

chip fireball wrote:

poolieinaustinstad is a loid on the wind up that has become tiresome. yawn1

Hey up Mr Chip, I'm on no wind up and I'm no loid thank you very much, and I'm also no yes man who will follow the pack at the first sign of trouble.
What we learned back in the day was to support our team through thick and thin, even back then in the day you got the odd few who would never be happy no matter what, it's just unfortunate we seem to have more of them now.
Fair enough you might want DW, Barker, Antwi, Elliott, Boland, and no doubt a few others I might have missed out, and one things for certain they will all eventually go, but they will be replaced by others that will all make mistakes at some point, then what, let's start hounding them out.
I wish I could be arsed to read your posts after the Luton, Orient, Leeds, Port Vale and Oldham games when all the above played a major part in those performances that were reckoned by most to be the best football we had ever played.
Your posts are just so one sided and cock eyed it's not true, if you want to slag players off for making mistakes then fair enough, just be consistant, i.e. Nelson going to ground too easily for the fist goal, no mention, Robson losing possesion too easily for the 2nd goal, no mention, Brown missing an absolute sitter 5 yard tap in to equalise, no mention, Barker missing a header from 8 yards, priceless just what we wanted.
There's been a few decent posts from the pessemists lately, (yours excluded obviously) regarding team spirit or lack of it and I do think that's a problem, cos I do think some of the new signings have just come for a decent salary and will jump ship anyway at the first opportunity for a couple of extra bob.
But I also think there is a fear factor amongst the players, no-one is prepared to take a chance or even want the ball anymore, so like I've said in the past we need more of clappp

and less of rage

And yes I know you give total support whilst you're there yawn2

but you also make sure you make up for it when you're not

This 'style' of writing seems very ...familiar...

pooielooieaustinstad · **Posted:** Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:01 pm

Fook me, is there a right and wrong way to write a post now, I wish someone would explain the rules to the optimists.

LeicesterPoolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm **Posts:** 1278

pooielooieaustinstad wrote:

chip fireball wrote:

poolieinaustinstad is a loid on the wind up that has become tiresome. yawn1

Hey up Mr Chip, I'm on no wind up and I'm no loid thank you very much, and I'm also no yes man who will follow the pack at the first sign of trouble.
What we learned back in the day was to support our team through thick and thin, even back then in the day you got the odd few who would never be happy no matter what, it's just unfortunate we seem to have more of them now.
Fair enough you might want DW, Barker, Antwi, Elliott, Boland, and no doubt a few others I might have missed out, and one things for certain they will all eventually go, but they will be replaced by others that will all make mistakes at some point, then what, let's start hounding them out.
I wish I could be arsed to read your posts after the Luton, Orient, Leeds, Port Vale and Oldham games when all the above played a major part in those performances that were reckoned by most to be the best football we had ever played.
Your posts are just so one sided and cock eyed it's not true, if you want to slag players off for making mistakes then fair enough, just be consistant, i.e. Nelson going to ground too easily for the fist goal, no mention, Robson losing possesion too easily for the 2nd goal, no mention, Brown missing an absolute sitter 5 yard tap in to equalise, no mention, Barker missing a header from 8 yards, priceless just what we wanted.
There's been a few decent posts from the pessemists lately, (yours excluded obviously) regarding team spirit or lack of it and I do think that's a problem, cos I do think some of the new signings have just come for a decent salary and will jump ship anyway at the first opportunity for a couple of extra bob.
But I also think there is a fear factor amongst the players, no-one is prepared to take a chance or even want the ball anymore, so like I've said in the past we need more of clappp

and less of rage

And yes I know you give total support whilst you're there yawn2

but you also make sure you make up for it when you're not

You might as well be a Loid, if you are happy to get pleasure out of dross
Any idea, where the lack of team spirit might be coming from,
or who signed those 'mercenaries' who are talking the money and getting ready to run

pooielooieaustinstad · **Posted:** Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:35 pm

Any Idea who signed them? that's a silly question Mr Leicesterpoolie it was Mr Wilson of course, that's why I keep saying don't slag the players off, they are not going to refuse to play if selected are they, and it's up to DW to sort them out cos they're his players and if he can't I don't think anyone else can.
Can't ever remember ever saying I'm enjoying what we're watching at the moment stpid

And if you're not careful, by letting people know you weren't there on Tuesday night some of your collegues on this board might start telling you your not entitled to an opinion and that your not able to call yourself a supporter, a fate that was thrust upon poor Mr Jockthemonkey and Poolieoffshore last night, unless of course you agree with everything they say.

pooielooieaustinstad · **Posted:** Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:42 pm

pooielooieaustinstad wrote:

Any Idea who signed them? that's a silly question Mr Leicesterpoolie it was Mr Wilson of course, that's why I keep saying don't slag the players off, they are not going to refuse to play if selected are they, and it's up to DW to sort them out cos they're his players and if he can't I don't think anyone else can.
Can't ever remember ever saying I'm enjoying what we're watching at the moment stpid

And if you're not careful, by letting people know you weren't there on Tuesday night some of your collegues on this board might start telling you your not entitled to an opinion and that your not able to call yourself a supporter, a fate that was thrust upon poor Mr Jockthemonkey and Poolieoffshore last night, unless of course you agree with everything they say.

Whoops, maybe you were there on Tuesday, might have mis read one of your earlier post, guess that's another slagging off I've got coming. bbolt

LeicesterPoolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm **Posts:** 1278

I agree with a lot they say and if I was able to go to every game,
I think I would be having second thoughts about doing so, at the moment.

I seem to remember you were defending DW, after the Northampton game (which I did see).
Apologies if I am wrong.

btw it was Friday , not Tuesday
a bit of editing might be useful, so that I look silly, not you

pooielooieaustinstad · **Posted:** Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:33 pm

Just a fraudulent slip Mr Leicesterpoolie, you know how time flies when your having fun.
Don't think I was defending DW, but I won't have been slagging him off either, it's his team and our club, he didn't do too bad last season, and I honestly thought we would be in top 6 all season minimum, and I think and hope he will sort it out, but if we don't win on Tuesday I think it'll be curtains for him and then I think we will be in trouble.
I'm just not happy with the constant one eyed victimisation of certain players that are putting a lot more effort in than others. And if they bothered to watch in a bit more of a neutral objective manner they would see there are players performing far worse and making a lot more basic schoolboy errors.
And also the harping on about picking players that haven't been fit FFS just for the sake of a whinge.
Now I'm finding myself rambling on like Mr Chip, glad I'm going out soon thrilled

mouldy old dough · **Posted:** Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:37 pm

Is it still raining. rolfl

pooielooieaustinstad · **Posted:** Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:41 pm

chip fireball wrote:

perhaps we should just ignore the dull c*** until he wanders off from whence he came.

Good craic Mr Chip, there's no end to your wit and wisdom is there rolfl

mouldy old dough · **Posted:** Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:43 pm

chip fireball wrote:

perhaps we should just ignore the dull c*** until he wanders off from whence he came.

No need for that like.

TalbotAvenger · **Posted:** Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:03 pm

pooielooieaustinstad wrote:

jockthemonkey wrote:

offshorepoolie wrote:

sup·port·er Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[suh-pawr-ter, -pohr-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun

1. a person or thing that supports.
2. an adherent, follower, backer, or advocate.
3. a device, usually of elastic cotton webbing, for supporting some part of the body, esp. a jockstrap.
4. a garter, esp. one attached to a garter belt or girdle.
5. Heraldry. either of two human or animal figures flanking and supporting an escutcheon in an achievement of arms.

Support

sup·port –verb (used with object)

1. to bear or hold up (a load, mass, structure, part, etc.); serve as a foundation for.
2. to sustain or withstand (weight, pressure, strain, etc.) without giving way; serve as a prop for.
3. to undergo or endure, esp. with patience or submission; tolerate.
4. to sustain (a person, the mind, spirits, courage, etc.) under trial or affliction: They supported him throughout his ordeal.
5. to maintain (a person, family, establishment, institution, etc.) by supplying with things necessary to existence; provide for: to support a family.
6. to uphold (a person, cause, policy, etc.) by aid, countenance, one's vote, etc.; back; second.

I think some of you should read these definitions and see how you square them with being "supporters" who "support" a team..

I don't see the mackems baying for their Roy Keanes head and they're FAR worse offf than we are!

I'd look up the verb and adjectives for whinging gets or bad loser but I can't be arsed..

You all should take a sabatical before posting after defeat..

Unbeaten at home until yesterday since October..

Most of the detractors where only predicting a mid table finish this year..

Even I think that's the best we can hope for now but some of you will only be happy if we get relegated so you can say I told you so ... :roll:

Never mind we could always bounce back with the next sacrificial lamb who can be sacked after getting us promoted on the back of a club record run after a bit of a sticky patch at the start of season..

Finally

Oh I was'nt going to say it but maybe you'd be better off up the road and following messiah..... :shock:

WOW where did that come from i am shocked :shock:

but i feel i must warn you they are very unforgiving on here clappp

Now you've done it Mr offshorepoolie, they'll all be beside themselves, can you imagine the shock and horror on the faces, how dare you be positive and have a bit of optimism clappp

Were you a scriptwriter for 'Comical Ali' ?

'There was no defeat on Friday night; Hartlepool United played their best football since a Friday night defeat of Sheff Wed with a wonder goal from Mr Adam Boyd'

dawlishmonkey · **Joined:** Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:53 am **Posts:** 1588

mr Chip that's out of order.
all these posts about whether or not you attend home matches,fook me I've been to maybe 4 home matches this season but I didn't have much company at swansea or yeovil or gillingham etc.
my dad doesn't get to many games this season cos he's wheelchair bound,and he's only been to almost every home game since he was 14 until last year when he had a stroke,bloody part timer obviously now he can't have an opinion cos he doesn't go to every game

no6bus · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:55 pm **Posts:** 5096

yes but dont forget chip is a better supporter than most of us mere mortals
unless its on the telly :grin:

and he has played at a reasonable level
but i bet i played at a higher level i just dont shout about it all day every day :wink:

LeicesterPoolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm **Posts:** 1278

pooielooieaustinstad wrote:

Just a fraudulent slip Mr Leicesterpoolie, you know how time flies when your having fun.
Don't think I was defending DW, but I won't have been slagging him off either, it's his team and our club, he didn't do too bad last season, and I honestly thought we would be in top 6 all season minimum, and I think and hope he will sort it out, but if we don't win on Tuesday I think it'll be curtains for him and then I think we will be in trouble.
I'm just not happy with the constant one eyed victimisation of certain players that are putting a lot more effort in than others. And if they bothered to watch in a bit more of a neutral objective manner they would see there are players performing far worse and making a lot more basic schoolboy errors.
And also the harping on about picking players that haven't been fit FFS just for the sake of a whinge.
Now I'm finding myself rambling on like Mr Chip, glad I'm going out soon thrilled

I think you meant 'freudian' slip, your not Tom's English teacher are you

no6bus · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:55 pm **Posts:** 5096

chip my comment was in the past tense "played" not currently play

and in case you are wondering it was at 3000metres up mount teide which i feel will be at a far higher level than grayfields rolfl

Salty · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:24 am

chip fireball wrote:

these pair of jokers have suddenly appeared on the scene and want to divide us right down the middle. you are either an optimist and therefore a good and loyal supporter. or you are not. there is no middle ground, no debate.

thats the point and its shite

mouldy old dough · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:03 pm

Salty wrote:

chip fireball wrote:

these pair of jokers have suddenly appeared on the scene and want to divide us right down the middle. you are either an optimist and therefore a good and loyal supporter. or you are not. there is no middle ground, no debate.

thats the point and its shite

Who is us they are trying to divide Chip.
Old members. new members i dont understand and as for them just appearing on the scene well its an open message board for all pools fans is it not there is posts i do not like so i read them and move on.
I never thought of the board as an us and them membership just poolies enjoying the banter.
Am i right or wrong.

Salty · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:52 pm

but my making it into pessimists Vs optimists it IS turning it into us + them

and its silly, cos you are right were all Pools fans. naturally we don't have the same opinion but thats good.

anyways it seems to have died down for today, thank fook

mouldy old dough · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:32 pm

Salty wrote:

but my making it into pessimists Vs optimists it IS turning it into us + them

and its silly, cos you are right were all Pools fans. naturally we don't have the same opinion but thats good.

anyways it seems to have died down for today, thank fook

Nice one Salty.

MutleyRules · **Posted:** Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:45 pm

Fecking'ell....it's a Message Board for Fecks sake....if we all had the same opinion the Board would be very very borong!!!! :roll:

Fensy · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 9:15 pm **Posts:** 6520

MutleyRules wrote:

Fecking'ell....it's a Message Board for Fecks sake....if we all had the same opinion the Board would be very very borong!!!! :roll:

I fully concur

hang on a sec that gives me the same opinion as you Mutters :shock:

The Poolie Bunker

Supporters

Who is online