grabec wrote:
BritishWestHpool wrote:
I look bloody awful on some pictures, good on others.
Amy is no different. You've picked the worst pic you could imagine, face wise.
On others she looks fine indeed.
Heroin, alcohol or any other drugs do not make you look your best.
She's a good singer,not that she's my kind of stuff.
Singers are allowed to take drugs and get hammered too, if thats what they want to do with their lives. Its up to her. I'd say, judge her on her music. She never chose to be a role model and to have the paparazzi wankers follow her all over the place for w**ker papers such as the sun, mirror, sport, mail etc. She just chose to sing and then got a great deal.
I dont know her as a person so I wouldnt judge her as one. I certainly wouldnt trust the papers, whom I trust less than anyone I've ever met
Well said, British West. Good on you.
I can't get my head round the attitude to women some people on here have....even people whom I respect and who have intelligent views on other things. The woman is a singer. Who cares what she looks like or how many males she can induce to fancy her?
nope sorry, don't accept either of those arguments. BWH, she has chosen to live her life in the media. her and her tosspot husband use the press to gain publicity when it suits them and then whinge like buggery if the press don't dance to their tune (no pun intended). They can't have it both ways.
Grabec, my problem with her is that she has a responsibility to the public who supprt her by buying her records not to glamourise getting smacked off your tits at every opportunity, and then expect not to be hammered in court. doherty's another one. if he was pete doherty the plasterer, he would have been banged up by now, and that's just plain discrimination. All these feckers court the papers when they have a record to sell then whinge about harassment if the gutter press are reporting on them being grubby fookin junkies. They could do with a fookin good wash and big right hand.