Stewards enquiry result now in.Quote:
A statement from the sport's governing body, the FIA, said the fuel in the cars was "more than [the permitted] 10 degrees below the ambient temperature". The statement said Heidfeld's fuel was 13C lower than ambient at his first stop and 12C lower at his second. Kubica's varied by 14C, 13C and 13C at his three stops, while Rosberg's was 13C and 12C out at his two stops.
Filling the car with cooler fuel can give a performance advantage. Cooler fuel is denser, so either it can mean it takes slightly less time to refuel the car or marginally more can be added in the same time. And it would give a slight power advantage for about three laps before it returned to ambient temperature out on the track. Excluding the cars would have risked turning one of the most exciting championship finales in F1 history into a farce.
But the stewards had the power to disqualify them, even though the advantage conferred would have had no bearing on the title race. The total advantage for each car over the race distance was almost certainly no more than a second.
After 7 hours deliberation the stewards came out with a statement that they didn't have enough evidence! We are asked to believe that the most technological sport on the planet didn't have a thermometer. If they didn't have the evidence then why the enquiry? I smell the hand of the FIA, in particularly Bernie Ecclestone and Max Mosley.
If the rules have been broken but no penalty imposed then if I were Ron Dennis Id be livid, especially after having to fork out $100m.