Mr Irrelevant wrote:
Someone sometime has got to challenge this all powerful decision making of the FA.
If what he says is true they must appeal. Should they lose the appeal then they should challenge it in a higher court. The High Court if necessary. I do not understand the legal basis that the FA have to fine people for fairly trivial offences.
I totally agree.
I can't understand the situation in football where clubs and players seem to refuse to take incidents "further". Surely there must be a clause somewhere, perhaps in the competition rules, that states that clubs or individual players are not allowed to take the FA to court and that any decision made by the FA is final, otherwise there would be a constant flow to the Courts.
In Magnay's case, if this was an individual accused by the Police, following a complaint by a member of the public and there was not sufficient evidence to back the complaint up, the incident would be thrown out.
This FA type justice harks back to the 18th century. If we still had penal colonies then the FA would be sending people there.
Everyone just meekly accepts anything handed down by the FA and then says " we have to move on", instead of standing up to these autocratic bastards.