|
This is a piece posted elsewhere, Not by ME. -----------------------------:
I (like many of us I'm sure) have been fully in favour of three up / three down for ages. Why wouldn't you be? In that aim, we have the NL coordinating a 'day of action' with kick-offs at 3:03pm on Saturday week.
So far, nothing too much to disagree with.
However, have a read of these insights from the Chairman of Lincoln City, and we may want to turn our focus somewhere else if we want changes made that lead to 3 up and 3 down:
"Having been with Lincoln City when we were a National League club, I can fully understand the desire of NL clubs to push for a further promotion place into League 2. However, instead of the emotional and one-sided view presented, this time by York City, it would be far better for the NL and their clubs to rather push to address the issues that currently exist.
“It’s 22 years since the second promotion place from the NL was introduced and that only came through giving more money to EFL clubs to encourage them to vote in favour, but nothing was done to address the issues facing EFL clubs relegated to the NL.
“There are concerns we have put to the NL that we believe should be addressed in order to convince EFL clubs to vote in favour of an additional promotion and relegation place between the NL and League 2.
“Firstly, not only do EFL clubs lose their academy funding 2 years after relegation, but they also lose all rights to compensation for any of their academy players. We feel this is the most serious concern that needs to be resolved as it has dire consequences for clubs that are not immediately promoted back to the EFL and should also be a concern for English football in general to have long-standing academies at risk of being destroyed. If 3 clubs had been relegated from League 2 in the 23/24 season, this would have included a club with a Category 2 academy.
“We believe that so-called “bigger” clubs face prejudicial treatment in the NL, with the board dominated by representatives of clubs that have never been in the EFL. One only has to look at the irregular way Covid payments were distributed in the NL without the transparency and governance which took place in the EFL.
“To demonstrate this even further we were at the wrong end of a player compensation tribunal in our final year in the NL, coming up against a club whose Chairman was also a director of the NL. There was a total lack of transparency, independence or fairness in the ruling unlike you would find in the EFL or EPL.
“Although SCMP, which governs clubs spending on players in League 1 and 2, has many drawbacks including having no ultimate cap on player spending, there are at least controls in place whereas the NL at present has none of these.
“On a couple of occasions we have had the misfortune of NL clubs refusing to pay loan fees for a player. Unlike the situation in the EFL where the offending club would immediately be threatened with a transfer embargo, the NL has refused to take any action, forcing us to go through time-consuming FA tribunal processes to recover the funds.”
|