Why probable?

Mr Irrelevant · **Joined:** Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:25 pm **Posts:** 23005

Hartlepool Mail wrote:

POOLS (probable):

Budtz,
McCunnie, Nelson, Clark, Elliott,
Brown, Sweeney, Liddle, Foley,
Porter, Barker.

Subs: Lee-Barrett, Coles, Mackay, Boland, Moore.

Salty · **Posted:** Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:21 pm

probably because its a cruel joke and Ben Clark won't be playing....AGAIN!!!

?

:wink:

LeicesterPoolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:48 pm **Posts:** 1278

Is that for tonight , or Friday ?

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:10 pm

The probable team in the Hartlepool Mail is an educated guess. It's got as much going for it as any of us predicting a team, it's hardly ever right apart from when it's obvious which eleven will start.

I don't see any logic in starting Foley on the left, he's a striker who can play on the right. If Monkhouse isn't going to play which I doubt he will as it's daft risking his hamstring niggle in the paint pot cup you have got to play Robson or else it's pointless having the lad in the squad.

PJ_Poolie · **Posted:** Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:03 pm

Actual team;

Lee-Barratt

Liddle Clark Antwi Elliot
Moore McCunnie Sweeney Robson
Barker Brown

The Poolie Bunker

Why probable?

Who is online