MutleyRules wrote:
derwent wrote:
There is growing momentum for the state pension to be changed in such a way so as not to impoverish potentially millions of people.
One way is to means test the pension.
There are millionaires for example getting it and removing it from them will cause very little hardship, if none at all.
A bit like the Winter Fuel Payment Allowance then.

Well the u turn on the disastrous gung ho operation from the government over the removal of the WFA for around ten million of the country's elderly citizens has broadly been accepted but in no way forgotten by the public.
However if you analyse what has happened you will see that it has been capped in such a way that anybody with an income of over £36k will not get it.
The interesting thing about using £36k as the benchmark is it could be argued that the government are admitting that anybody earning less than £36k need the allowance, could it not.
Taking that to it's logical conclusion it starts to back up my suggestion that if the state pension was at a reasonable level there would be less or even no need to worry about starving and/or freezing elderly people struggling to make ends meet, or the need for supplementary benefits such as the WFA.
On a lighter note, if I had voted for this shower I would keep quiet about what happened to the WFA .
Something has to be done, so the more it's discussed the better.
I would further suggest that this becomes a cross party discussion within politics and, when sorted, backed by all of them. There's a great deal of wishful thinking attached to that suggestion but we have to start somewhere. It's not going away.