chip fireball wrote:
yes but hes got the same team that finished above walsall, mk dons and swindon last season. hes a highly paid football manager and its his job to produce a winning side. hes got knocking on for 30 proffessional footballers at his disposal and some of the teams he is up against, quite frankly, are dreadful.
Yes but each of these teams have been able to bring in significant numbers of players, especially Swindon who brought in over double figures!!! Whereas we have lost our best striker (and now maybe joel as well) who has not been replaced for reasons unknown.
chip fireball wrote:
barnet today were down to the bare bones. their squad isnt anywhere near the size of ours and their only 2 recognised strikers were both missing. they had a defender up front ( torquay earlier in the season had similar injury problems and fielded a centre forward at centre half) and still took 3 points because they came with a game plan, tweaked slightly at half time, and stuck to it.
Fair enough, completely agree that we should be beating a full strength Barnet side, let alone one with their current injury problems.
chip fireball wrote:
wilson isnt the only one to blame but im sick of hearing how its everyone elses fault. he picked the team and the formation today. he chose to take strikers off and bring midfield players on. and he chose to take foley off and play with one recognised striker when we were one behind with 7 minutes to go. why not take a defender off and go with 3 up front against a team who were happy to sit back ?
In terms of the substitues I can't explain, I wasn't there today but even Sweeney on Poolsworld was a little surprised that Daly was took off for Bullock.
chip fireball wrote:
on a final note he was the one who chose to sign 3 midfield players when a goalscorer was top priority. gibb is a waste of space. boland is a good player but cant see out 90 minutes and liddle, after a bright start, is looking less convincing by the game. its about time he started accepting some of the blame himself. im not saying he should be sacked but i am far from convinced that he has what it takes to turn this club around.
Who's to say he hasn't tried to sign a goalscorer, none of us (despite what some of us think) know what goes on behind the scenes. Liddle is a quality player and at only 20 will improve the longer he's here. I'll admit that from a personal point of view I did not think centre mid was the priority (I personally (as well as the obvious striker) would like a left back, move humph to left wing and then use robson as an impact sub) but there is no denying that Boland and Liddle are much better than Strachan and Tinkler.
However at the end of the day he picks the 11 and he chooses the substitues and so must take some of the blame for performances like today. My only point is that a lot of people seem to think if we ship him out we'll be ok, the problems lie much deeper than that due to the rot that has set in with the players, until we get a fresh bunch (and I'm talking major surgery) then we will continue to stay at this current level.