OUR SQUAD

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:56 pm

Are you happy with the quality in the squad in every position?

I reckon;

GK- weak, needs to improve
RB- good, McCunnie first choice, Gibb showed last night he is ok as cover there
LB- ok, Humphreys isn't doing too bad a job and Elliot or Liddle could come in if necessary
CB- needs to improve, at the moment I would say Clark is the only dependable one
RM- ok, Moore is doing fine out there but only Brown and Gibb as cover
LM- ok IF Monkhouse is staying, and even then we've no cover for him
CM- weak, both in depth and quality- neither Liddle, Sweeney or Boland have really shone this season
CF- weak in depth, Porter and Brown could do a job as a pair, Mackay has potential, Barker and Foley are a waste of time at this level.

dawlishmonkey · **Joined:** Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:53 am **Posts:** 1588

pre season you wouldn't of put money on our weakest positions being the centre backs and the front 2 would you?
the weakness of the squad is only highlighted because some key players aren't performing as well this season,might be due to better opposition I don't know I haven't managed or played at a reasonable level.

aido87 · **Posted:** Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:34 pm

Mr Ripper wrote:

Are you happy with the quality in the squad in every position?

I reckon;

GK- weak, needs to improve
RB- good, McCunnie first choice, Gibb showed last night he is ok as cover there
LB- ok, Humphreys isn't doing too bad a job and Elliot or Liddle could come in if necessary
CB- needs to improve, at the moment I would say Clark is the only dependable one
RM- ok, Moore is doing fine out there but only Brown and Gibb as cover
LM- ok IF Monkhouse is staying, and even then we've no cover for him
CM- weak, both in depth and quality- neither Liddle, Sweeney or Boland have really shone this season
CF- weak in depth, Porter and Brown could do a job as a pair, Mackay has potential, Barker and Foley are a waste of time at this level.

GK - weak ???

Cowboy · **Posted:** Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:39 pm

aido87 wrote:

Mr Ripper wrote:

Are you happy with the quality in the squad in every position?

I reckon;

GK- weak, needs to improve
RB- good, McCunnie first choice, Gibb showed last night he is ok as cover there
LB- ok, Humphreys isn't doing too bad a job and Elliot or Liddle could come in if necessary
CB- needs to improve, at the moment I would say Clark is the only dependable one
RM- ok, Moore is doing fine out there but only Brown and Gibb as cover
LM- ok IF Monkhouse is staying, and even then we've no cover for him
CM- weak, both in depth and quality- neither Liddle, Sweeney or Boland have really shone this season
CF- weak in depth, Porter and Brown could do a job as a pair, Mackay has potential, Barker and Foley are a waste of time at this level.

GK - weak ???

I would say so! Doesent command his box, doean't talk to the defence & he dithers about whether to stay on his line or come out, can't make his mind up sometimes - that's weak as far as I'm concerned!

Tax Paying Poolie · **Joined:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:18 am **Posts:** 9053

Cowboy wrote:

aido87 wrote:

Mr Ripper wrote:

Are you happy with the quality in the squad in every position?

I reckon;

GK- weak, needs to improve
RB- good, McCunnie first choice, Gibb showed last night he is ok as cover there
LB- ok, Humphreys isn't doing too bad a job and Elliot or Liddle could come in if necessary
CB- needs to improve, at the moment I would say Clark is the only dependable one
RM- ok, Moore is doing fine out there but only Brown and Gibb as cover
LM- ok IF Monkhouse is staying, and even then we've no cover for him
CM- weak, both in depth and quality- neither Liddle, Sweeney or Boland have really shone this season
CF- weak in depth, Porter and Brown could do a job as a pair, Mackay has potential, Barker and Foley are a waste of time at this level.

GK - weak ???

I would say so! Doesent command his box, doean't talk to the defence & he dithers about whether to stay on his line or come out, can't make his mind up sometimes - that's weak as far as I'm concerned!

yet Coventry still signed him! Strange.

Mr Ripper · **Posted:** Tue Nov 20, 2007 9:28 am

Cowboy wrote:

aido87 wrote:

Mr Ripper wrote:

Are you happy with the quality in the squad in every position?

I reckon;

GK- weak, needs to improve
RB- good, McCunnie first choice, Gibb showed last night he is ok as cover there
LB- ok, Humphreys isn't doing too bad a job and Elliot or Liddle could come in if necessary
CB- needs to improve, at the moment I would say Clark is the only dependable one
RM- ok, Moore is doing fine out there but only Brown and Gibb as cover
LM- ok IF Monkhouse is staying, and even then we've no cover for him
CM- weak, both in depth and quality- neither Liddle, Sweeney or Boland have really shone this season
CF- weak in depth, Porter and Brown could do a job as a pair, Mackay has potential, Barker and Foley are a waste of time at this level.

GK - weak ???

I would say so! Doesent command his box, doean't talk to the defence & he dithers about whether to stay on his line or come out, can't make his mind up sometimes - that's weak as far as I'm concerned!

Well said Mr Cowboy. clappp

The Poolie Bunker

OUR SQUAD

Who is online